<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>What We Should Know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com</link>
	<description>Issues Without The Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:54:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gun Advocates Object Just To Object?</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/gun-advocates-object-just-to-object/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=gun-advocates-object-just-to-object</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/gun-advocates-object-just-to-object/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microstamping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I wonder if Second Amendment or gun advocates object to any laws related to guns just because they can. Since the 1990&#8242;s a technology has existed called microstamping. Microstamping stamps a microscopic number on a bullet casing as it is fired from a semi-automatic weapon. This technology would supplement or replace ballistic analysis techniques&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/gun-advocates-object-just-to-object/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/gun-advocates-object-just-to-object/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Job Record</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/obamas-job-record/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamas-job-record</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/obamas-job-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debt Ceiling/Limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Budget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Rattner showed this chart this morning on Morning Joe. It is very telling about Obama&#8217;s jobs record. Is the private sector doing fine? Yes, except if you are in the construction or finance industries. The drag on jobs comes from the decline in government, construction and finance jobs. If these sectors were just at&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/obamas-job-record/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/06/obamas-job-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Your Child To Sleep</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/04/get-your-child-to-sleep/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=get-your-child-to-sleep</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/04/get-your-child-to-sleep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/04/get-your-child-to-sleep/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing political here just some interesting links between sleep(or the lack of it) and ADHD. As a Mom, I know my kids get in more trouble, can&#8217;t concentrate and in general act crazy when they&#8217;re tired. Now doctors are figuring that out too. They&#8217;re finding that kids that have their sleep disrupted or simply don&#8217;t&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/04/get-your-child-to-sleep/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/04/get-your-child-to-sleep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare&#8217;s 3rd Day In Court</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-3rd-day-in-court/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamacares-3rd-day-in-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-3rd-day-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform/Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-3rd-day-in-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The third day was devoted to discussing if the rest of Obamacare should be struck down if the requirement to buy insurance is struck down. The alternatives include leaving the rest of the law intact or having the justices strike down additional parts of the law that are related to the mandate. In the end&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-3rd-day-in-court/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-3rd-day-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacares 2nd Day In Court</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-2nd-day-in-court/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamacares-2nd-day-in-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-2nd-day-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform/Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-2nd-day-in-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By most accounts, day 2 did not go well for the President&#8217;s health care bill. We will have to wait until June for the decision. SCOTUS BLOG has a nice compilation of high lights of yesterday&#8217;s hearings: http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/03/highlights-from-tuesdays-argument-about-the-individual-mandate/ Up to day &#8211; Severability]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-2nd-day-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacares 1st Day In Court</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-1st-day-in-court/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamacares-1st-day-in-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-1st-day-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform/Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-1st-day-in-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This New York Times quote seems to summarize Obamacares first day in court: &#8220;“This case presents issues of great moment,” said Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr., “and the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the court’s consideration of those issues.” The justices appeared to agree, and they seemed ready to proceed to the main question.&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-1st-day-in-court/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacares-1st-day-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare Goes To Supreme Court Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacare-goes-to-supreme-court-tomorrow/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamacare-goes-to-supreme-court-tomorrow</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacare-goes-to-supreme-court-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform/Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacare-goes-to-supreme-court-tomorrow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could fill up an entire blog for the next decade listing all of the blog entries and editorials. I&#8217;m not going to do that but I did want to post a general schedule for the three days of hearings. Monday &#8211; Anti-injunction Act. Basically there is a very old law on the books that&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacare-goes-to-supreme-court-tomorrow/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/03/obamacare-goes-to-supreme-court-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is wrong with our Government?</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/what-is-wrong-with-our-government/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-wrong-with-our-government</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/what-is-wrong-with-our-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/what-is-wrong-with-our-government/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NYT has two good op-eds about the U.S&#8217;s form of Government today. The first is an interesting op-ed, Why China&#8217;s Political Model is Superior&#8221; which discusses the culturally different attitudes about the function of Government in the U.S and in China. It concludes, of course, that the Chinese attitude toward Government and the Government&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/what-is-wrong-with-our-government/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/what-is-wrong-with-our-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOX News Moves Left?</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/fox-news-moves-left/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fox-news-moves-left</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/fox-news-moves-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/fox-news-moves-left/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit, I don&#8217;t watch FOX News except if it&#8217;s on at a place I happen to be. I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;ve ever actually watched more than 15 minutes at a time, so I missed the sudden shift to the left that FOX has made. Wow, who knew? Politico broke the story on as&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/fox-news-moves-left/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2012/02/fox-news-moves-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rebellious Rookie Republicans Rumble</title>
		<link>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2011/12/rebellious-rookie-republicans-rumble/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rebellious-rookie-republicans-rumble</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2011/12/rebellious-rookie-republicans-rumble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Centerist Cynic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Federal Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll tax extension]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2011/12/rebellious-rookie-republicans-rumble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans are once again chaffing at being &#8220;told&#8221; what to do by the Senate. After campaigning extensively against extending the payroll tax cut, House Republicans are now crying foul at the two month extension compromise reached by the Senate. House Republicans are claiming they wanted a one year extension all along and that a&#160;<a href="http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2011/12/rebellious-rookie-republicans-rumble/" class="read-more">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatweshouldknowblog.com/2011/12/rebellious-rookie-republicans-rumble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
